New Delhi (National Times): Satya Pal Malik, a seasoned politician and former Governor of several Indian states, passed away today at the age of 79. Known for his unfiltered candor, political tenacity, and fearless criticism of the establishment, Malik’s death has left a void in Indian public life.
He had been battling a prolonged illness and was undergoing treatment at Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital in Delhi, where he breathed his last early this morning. His health had deteriorated significantly in recent months, with reports confirming severe kidney-related complications.
A Political Career Built Across Party Lines
Hailing from Baghpat in Uttar Pradesh, Satya Pal Malik began his political journey as a student leader and went on to represent both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Over the decades, he was associated with several parties, from Janata Dal and Samajwadi Party to later aligning with the Bharatiya Janata Party. Regardless of political shifts, Malik remained rooted in his convictions.
He served as the Governor of Bihar, Jammu & Kashmir, Goa, and Meghalaya, holding office during some of the most politically sensitive moments in recent Indian history.
Governor During Article 370 Revocation
As the Governor of Jammu & Kashmir from 2018 to 2019, Malik was at the helm when the Centre abrogated Article 370 — a constitutional move that fundamentally altered the region’s relationship with the Union of India. His tenure during that turbulent period brought him both national prominence and criticism.
Following his governorship, Malik became known for openly speaking against the Union Government on several issues, including the farmers’ protests and the 2019 Pulwama attack, where he alleged security lapses and intelligence failures. His blunt remarks often placed him at odds with his former political allies.
Facing Pressure but Standing Firm
In May 2025, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet against Malik in connection with alleged corruption during his tenure in Jammu & Kashmir. Malik denied any wrongdoing, stating that he had in fact “exposed corruption, not participated in it.” Despite facing mounting pressure, he refused to be silenced, continuing to speak out even during his final months.
