Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Ban on Foreign Student Enrollment at Harvard

Washington D.C., May 23, 2025 — In a major legal setback for the Trump administration, a U.S. federal judge has blocked the decision to bar Harvard University from enrolling foreign students. The ruling comes just one day after the administration revoked Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), citing concerns over antisemitism and alleged foreign influence.

The federal court, presided over by Judge Allison Burroughs of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, issued a temporary restraining order preventing the implementation of the policy. Harvard had immediately challenged the move, calling it arbitrary, retaliatory, and damaging to the rights and futures of more than 7,000 international students currently studying at the university.

The Trump administration’s decision, announced by the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Kristi Noem, accused Harvard of hosting “anti-American” protests and failing to comply with a request to submit records of students allegedly involved in anti-Israel demonstrations. It also raised unverified concerns about the university’s research ties with institutions in China.

In its lawsuit, Harvard argued that the federal government’s action violated constitutional protections related to due process and free speech, and would cause “immediate and irreparable harm” to its students and academic programs. The university also stated that the decision appeared politically motivated and lacked any transparent or justified process.

Judge Burroughs, in her brief ruling, stated that there was sufficient evidence to support Harvard’s claim that the revocation was unjustified and potentially unconstitutional. The court has scheduled further hearings to determine whether the administration’s actions can stand legal scrutiny.

The ruling has been welcomed by higher education institutions and civil rights groups nationwide. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is expected to appeal.

This legal battle could have far-reaching implications on how U.S. immigration policy intersects with academic freedom, student rights, and the autonomy of universities.